Trump's hush money case has gone to the jury. What happens now? (2024)

NEW YORK (AP) — After nearly two dozen witnesses, 16 days of testimony and hours of lawyers’ closing arguments, it’s time for the jurors to have their say in Donald Trump’s hush money trial.

Jury deliberations began Wednesday in the first criminal trial of a former U.S. president. The seven-man, five-woman panel is tasked with deciding whether Trump is guilty of any of 34 felony counts of falsifying his company’s records.

Prosecutors say Trump falsified the records to veil reimbursem*nts to his then-lawyer Michael Cohen, who had paid p*rn actor Stormy Daniels $130,000 in the final weeks of the 2016 campaign not to air her claim that she and Trump had sex a decade earlier.

The former president and presumptive Republican nominee has pleaded not guilty, denies any sexual interaction with Daniels and argues that the payments to Cohen were correctly designated as legal expenses in company records.

Now that the case has gone to the jury, here’s a look at how deliberations will work.

WHAT IS THE JURY DECIDING?

If the jury convicts Trump, it must unanimously find he created a false entry in his company’s records, or caused someone else to do so, and that he did so with the intent of violating or concealing a violation of a state law making it illegal for conspirators “to promote or prevent the election of any person to a public office by unlawful means.”

READ MORE

Inside the courtroom as Donald Trump learned he had been convicted

Here’s what you should know about Donald Trump’s conviction in his hush money trial

Doomsday plot: Idaho jury convicts Chad Daybell of killing wife and girlfriend’s 2 children

A conviction would mean that jurors all agreed that something unlawful was done to promote Trump’s election. But they don’t have to be unanimous on what that unlawful thing was. In this case, jurors could choose between three possible unlawful acts:

-- They could find that one of the conspirators broke the Federal Election Campaign Act, which in 2016 made it illegal for a person to give something worth more than $2,700 to a presidential campaign. It also banned corporations from contributing to a campaign.

-- They could find that other business records were falsified, including federal tax forms that Trump’s company issued to Cohen, bank records associated with Cohen’s payment to Daniels, or an invoice used when the National Enquirer’s parent company paid Karen McDougal, a former model who claimed to have had an affair with Trump, which he denied.

-- They could find that false information was submitted on a tax return.

For a conviction, each juror would have to find that at least one of those unlawful things happened.

WHERE DO DELIBERATIONS HAPPEN?

Behind closed doors in a room reserved for the jury.

While the 12 deliberate, the six alternate jurors who have also observed the whole trial will be in a separate space in the courthouse. If a jury member is unable to continue because of illness or other reasons, an alternate juror will then take that person’s place, and deliberations will begin anew.

Jurors went into deliberations after getting detailed instructions on the relevant laws in the case, what must be proven in order for them to convict, and their duty to acquit if it’s not proven. They had to hand over their cellphones to court officers to hold.

WHAT WILL WE KNOW ABOUT THE DISCUSSIONS?

Very little. The deliberations are secret, though jurors — whose identities are being kept from the public — can have a court officer deliver notes from them to the judge.

The first came about 3 1/2 hours into deliberations, when the jury asked to rehear some testimony from Cohen and former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker. Then, while the attorneys and court were gathering that testimony, jurors sent a request to rehear Judge Juan M. Merchan’s instructions on the laws applicable to the case.

Merchan read the jurors’ notes in court and discussed with prosecutors and defense lawyers how to respond. Then jurors were brought into court for a question from the judge: whether they wanted all of the legal instructions or just part. After explaining that they could answer by note, he sent them home for the evening.

The rereading will begin Thursday morning and will be done aloud from the trial transcript. (Jurors don’t have the transcript in the jury room but do have a court laptop loaded with documents and other materials that were shown during the trial.)

Court-watchers sometimes speculate about what the contents of a note might imply about the deliberations, but there’s no way to know for sure.

Jurors also send a note to signal when they have reached a verdict — or, sometimes, to say they’re bogged down.

WHERE WILL TRUMP BE IN THE MEANTIME?

He doesn’t have to stay in the courtroom itself but must be in the building. During the trial, he and his attorneys and security personnel have had the use of a courtroom across the hall for breaks.

HOW LONG WILL JURORS DELIBERATE?

As long as they need to. The standard court day runs from 9:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., with a break for lunch (jurors’ meals will be delivered). But judges sometimes extend the hours if jurors wish. There’s no limit on how many days deliberations can continue.

DO THE JURORS GET TO GO HOME?

Yes, at the end of each court day. The jury isn’t sequestered, the legal term for isolating the panel from the outside world. That was once mandatory for many felony cases in New York state, but the requirement was lifted in 2001, and sequestration is now rare.

WHAT HAPPENS IF THERE’S A VERDICT?

Jurors will send a note, via a court officer, saying there is a verdict, but not what it is. The judge will summon Trump, his defense team and prosecutors back to the courtroom if they’re not there already, and then announce that the jury has reached a verdict.

Then the jury will be brought in, and the foreperson — in New York, that job generally goes to the first juror chosen — will be asked whether the jury has reached a verdict. If the answer is yes, the foreperson will then be asked what the verdict is for each count and will answer either “guilty” or “not guilty.”

Then the jury likely will be asked collectively, “Is this your verdict?” Prosecutors or defense lawyers also can ask to have each juror asked the same question individually.

WHAT HAPPENS IF THERE ISN’T A VERDICT?

If jurors send a note saying they can’t agree, the judge, in consultation with both sides, must decide what to do next. Defense lawyers might seek an immediate mistrial. That could be granted, but often, the response is to call the jury in for some form of instruction to keep trying.

Prosecutors and defense lawyers often debate what should be said. Judges may look to the New York court system’s sample language for what’s known as a “modified Allen charge.” It urges jurors to make every possible effort to reach a verdict, and to be willing to reconsider their positions without abandoning their conscience or judgment just to go along with others.

If deadlock notes continue, the message may be repeated or tweaked. So, too, arguments for a mistrial. There’s no hard-and-fast rule about how long a jury must keep attempting to resolve differences before a mistrial can be declared.

Trump's hush money case has gone to the jury. What happens now? (2024)

FAQs

How to answer jury selection questions? ›

Though some of the questions may seem personal, you should answer then completely and honestly. If you are uncomfortable answering them, tell the judge and he/she may ask them privately. Remember: Questions are not asked to embarrass you.

When a prospective juror is dismissed with a reason acceptable to the judge in the case, it is called a challenge for cause.? ›

Challenge for cause is a practice that allows attorneys to remove prospective jurors who can't render a fair and impartial verdict. A juror's inability to hear a particular case may be based on a variety of factors, including close relationships with a party in the case, or actual and implied biases.

What reasons might an attorney use a peremptory challenge? ›

The purpose of a peremptory challenge is to eliminate jurors with high risks of bias. Since each side in a trial has the use of peremptory challenges, the outcome of this practice should be fair.

What makes a bad juror? ›

It is important to distinguish an ineligible juror from one who simply cannot be impartial due to a life experience, a strong religious belief, a loyalty to law enforcement due to a family member or friend being in law enforcement or some other factor that prevents that juror from hearing all the evidence before making ...

What are the three essential steps to voir dire? ›

Here are the three tips to effectively deal with bias during voir dire:
  • Educate (potential jurors about how bias works)
  • Locate (those on the panel who are biased)
  • Eliminate (biased panelists by establishing challenges for cause)
Feb 3, 2021

What are the two challenges used to disqualify prospective jurors? ›

When selecting a jury, both parties may remove potential jurors using an unlimited number of challenges for cause (e.g., stated reasons such as bias) and a limited number of peremptory challenges (i.e., do not need to state a reason).

Can a peremptory challenge be denied? ›

If your peremptory challenge is granted, a new judge will be assigned. If your peremptory challenge is denied, the judge will remain on your case.

What are the two methods for removing potential jurors? ›

One is a peremptory challenge, for which no reason has to be given, but it can't be based on race, religion or ethnicity, and there are a limited amount these (usually nine). The other is a removal for cause challenge, on grounds that the person can't be impartial based on bias or conflict. These are unlimited.

What is the questioning of potential jurors during jury selection? ›

The judge and attorneys ask the potential jurors questions, general or related to the specific case before them, to determine their suitability to serve on the jury. This process is called voir dire, which typically results in some prospective jurors being excused, based on their answers, from serving in that trial.

What is a question of fact for the jury to decide? ›

A question of fact is resolved by a trier of fact, i.e. a jury or, at a bench trial, a judge, weighing the strength of evidence and credibility of witnesses. Conversely, a question of law is always resolved by a judge.

Are you supposed to look at the jury when answering questions? ›

Be sure to understand the question, have it repeated if necessary, then give a thoughtful, considered answer. 8. Don't be afraid to look the jury in the eye and tell the story. Jurors are naturally sympathetic to the witness and want to hear what he or she has to say.

What disqualifies you from jury duty in Florida? ›

Persons who are under prosecution for any crime or who have been convicted in Florida or any other state, territory or country or in any federal court of bribery, forgery, perjury, larceny, or any other offense that is a felony in the State of Florida (unless their civil rights have been restored).

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Virgilio Hermann JD

Last Updated:

Views: 5557

Rating: 4 / 5 (61 voted)

Reviews: 84% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Virgilio Hermann JD

Birthday: 1997-12-21

Address: 6946 Schoen Cove, Sipesshire, MO 55944

Phone: +3763365785260

Job: Accounting Engineer

Hobby: Web surfing, Rafting, Dowsing, Stand-up comedy, Ghost hunting, Swimming, Amateur radio

Introduction: My name is Virgilio Hermann JD, I am a fine, gifted, beautiful, encouraging, kind, talented, zealous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.