All Silicon Valley Bank customers' funds are guaranteed, U.S. officials say (2024)

The U.S. government took extraordinary steps Sunday to stop a potential banking crisis after the historic failure of Silicon Valley Bank, assuring those who had made deposits at the failed financial institution that they would be able to access all of their money quickly, even as another major bank was shut down.

The announcement came hours before stock trading reopened in Asia, and amid fears that the factors behind the collapse of the Santa Clara, Calif., lender could spread and affect other institutions. Regulators had worked all weekend to come up with a buyer for the bank, but as of Sunday evening those efforts appeared to have failed.

Business

Column: The Silicon Valley Bank collapse is Silicon Valley’s problem, not yours

The Silicon Valley Bank failure is the old story of what happens when short-term depositors want their money back from a bank with only long-term assets.

March 10, 2023

In a sign of how quickly the financial bleeding was occurring, regulators announced that New York-based Signature Bank had failed and was being seized on Sunday. With more than $110 billion in assets, Signature Bank is the third-largest bank to fail in U.S. history.

Advertisem*nt

In an effort to shore up confidence in the banking system, the U.S. Treasury Department, Federal Reserve and Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. said Sunday that all Silicon Valley Bank clients would be protected and have access to their funds. Officials also announced steps they were taking to prevent more bank runs.

The plan “will ensure that the U.S. banking system continues to perform its vital roles of protecting deposits and providing access to credit to households and businesses in a manner that promotes strong and sustainable economic growth,” the agencies said in a joint statement.

Under the plan, those who had deposited money at Silicon Valley Bank or Signature Bank, including those whose holdings exceed the $250,000 insurance limit, will be able to access their money on Monday.

In a separate move Sunday, the Federal Reserve announced the creation of an expansive emergency lending program to help prevent a wave of bank runs that would threaten the stability of the banking system and the economy as a whole.

Technology and the Internet

Column: Silicon Valley Bank broke. Silicon Valley is broken

The failure of Silicon Valley Bank demonstrates the risk in showering unproven companies with cash and in handing so much power to venture capitalists to manage the process.

March 12, 2023

Officials at the Fed characterized the program as akin to what central banks have done for many decades: Lend freely to the banking system so that customers are confident that they can access their accounts whenever needed.

The program’s emergency lending facility will allow banks to borrow from the Fed to pay depositors, rather than having to sell Treasuries and other securities to raise the cash. Silicon Valley Bank had to dump some of its Treasuries at a loss to cover its customers’ withdrawals. Under the Fed’s new program, banks can post those securities as collateral and borrow from the emergency facility.

The Treasury has set aside $25 billion to offset any losses incurred under the Fed’s emergency lending facility. Fed officials said, however, that they did not expect to have to use any of that money, given that the securities posted as collateral have a very low risk of default.

Analysts said the Fed’s program should be enough to calm financial markets on Monday.

“Monday will surely be a stressful day for many in the regional banking sector, but today’s action dramatically reduces the risk of further contagion,” economists at Jefferies, an investment bank, said in a research note.

Though Sunday’s steps marked the most extensive government intervention in the banking system since the 2008 financial crisis, its actions are limited compared with the response 15 years ago. The two failed banks themselves have not been rescued, and taxpayer money has not been provided to them.

“Amazing news, and exactly what I expected, but Silicon Valley lives with investor confidence and I’m still hoping POTUS will appear on TV ... and assure the world that everything is fine,” said Moaz Hamid, a venture capitalist and longtime client of Silicon Valley Bank.

President Biden said Sunday evening as he boarded Air Force One back to Washington that he would speak about the bank situation on Monday. In a statement, he also said he was “firmly committed to holding those responsible for this mess fully accountable and to continuing our efforts to strengthen oversight and regulation of larger banks so that we are not in this position again.”

Regulators had to rush Friday to close Silicon Valley Bank, which had over $200 billion in assets, when it experienced a run of clients rushing to withdraw their money all at once. It is the second-largest bank failure in U.S. history, behind the 2008 failure of Washington Mutual.

Advertisem*nt

Some prominent executives in Silicon Valley feared that if Washington didn’t rescue the failed bank, customers would make runs on other financial institutions in the coming days. Stock prices plunged over the last few days at other banks that cater to technology companies, including First Republic Bank and PacWest Bank.

Silicon Valley Bank began its slide into insolvency when its customers — largely technology companies that needed cash as they struggled to get financing — started withdrawing their deposits. The bank had to sell bonds at a loss to cover the withdrawals.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet L. Yellen described interest rates, which the Federal Reserve has increased to combat inflation, as the core problem for Silicon Valley Bank. Many of the bank’s assets, such as bonds or mortgage-backed securities, lost market value as interest rates climbed.

Then-FDIC chair Sheila Bair recalled that with almost all of the bank failures during the 2008 financial crisis, “we sold a failed bank to a healthy bank. And usually, the healthy acquirer would also cover the uninsured because they wanted the franchise value of those large depositors. So optimally, that’s the best outcome.”

But she told NBC’s “Meet the Press” that with Silicon Valley Bank, the problem “was a liquidity failure — it was a bank run — so they didn’t have time to prepare to market the bank. So they’re having to do that now, and playing catch-up.”

Rugaber and Megerian reported from Washington and Sweet and Bussewitz from New York. Times staff writer Jeff Bercovici in Berkeley and Associated Press staff writers Hope Yen in Washington and Jennifer McDermott in Providence, R.I., contributed to this report.

More to Read

  • Nearly all FTX customers are getting their money back: What to know

    May 9, 2024

  • L.A.’s ‘bank to the stars’ is fined $65 million for lapses in its risk controls

    Feb. 1, 2024

  • What’s the fate of California’s pandemic preparedness ballot measure backed by Sam Bankman-Fried?

    Nov. 27, 2023

All Silicon Valley Bank customers' funds are guaranteed, U.S. officials say (2024)

FAQs

All Silicon Valley Bank customers' funds are guaranteed, U.S. officials say? ›

U.S. says all deposits at failed bank will be available Monday. The Biden administration announced Sunday night that all depositors at the failed Silicon Valley Bank would have access to all their money on Monday morning, approving an extraordinary intervention aimed at averting a crisis in the financial system.

Will everyone get their money back from Silicon Valley Bank? ›

In an effort to shore up confidence in the banking system, the U.S. Treasury Department, Federal Reserve and Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. said Sunday that all Silicon Valley Bank clients would be protected and have access to their funds.

What happened to Silicon Valley Bank customers money? ›

All deposits of SVB were transferred to the National Bank of Santa Clara, and insured depositors had access to their funds on March 13.

Will SVB depositors get their money? ›

Federal regulators made the emergency decision earlier in March to guarantee that all depositors at failed Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank could get their money back, regardless of how much was in their accounts. Regulators have said they hoped the decision would prevent a broader run on banks.

Who guaranteed SVB deposits? ›

FDIC Acts to Protect All Depositors of the former Silicon Valley Bank, Santa Clara, California | FDIC.

Are taxpayers paying for Silicon Valley Bank? ›

Still, while today taxpayers bear no direct cost for the failure of Silicon Valley and Signature, other banks may have to help defray the cost of covering uninsured deposits. Over time, those banks could pass higher costs on to customers, forcing everyone to pay more for services.

What is the recovery rate for Silicon Valley Bank? ›

It announced that it would begin paying dividends for uninsured funds within the following week as SVB's assets were liquidated. Moody's Investor Service projected a recovery rate for uninsured depositors of 80–90 percent.

Which banks are failing in 2024? ›

Republic First Bank reported unrealized securities losses in excess of its equity as early as June 2022. State regulators closed Republic First Bank in April 2024, marking the first bank failure of the year.

Who pulled money out of Silicon Valley Bank? ›

On March 9, when markets opened, SVB's stock fell 30%. The bank's stock eventually fell by 60% that day. A growing number of venture capitalists and startups started to pull their money out of the bank, which added to the downward pressure on the stock.

Was Silicon Valley Bank FDIC-insured? ›

Is Silicon Valley Bank insured? While Silicon Valley Bank is FDIC-insured, one of the unique aspects of the institution is the number of depositors whose accounts were over the FDIC limit: More than 93% of the domestic deposits at SVB were above $250,000.

How much will SVB depositors get back? ›

FDIC insurance means that any money you have in an SVB bank account up to $250,000 will be fully covered. You will get all that money back.

How much money is insured by the FDIC if I have $300000 in a savings account and my bank fails? ›

The standard deposit insurance coverage limit is $250,000 per depositor, per FDIC-insured bank, per ownership category. Deposits held in different ownership categories are separately insured, up to at least $250,000, even if held at the same bank.

Who bailed out SVB depositors? ›

In this fogged environment, the Federal Reserve, the Treasury Department, and the FDIC chose to invoke emergency authority to undertake a bailout of SVB's uninsured depositors.

Will everyone get their money back from SVB? ›

Depositors will have access to all of their money starting Monday, March 13,” the Treasury Department, Federal Reserve and Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. said in a joint statement. “No losses associated with the resolution of Silicon Valley Bank will be borne by the taxpayer.”

What happened to Silicon Valley Bank deposits? ›

The FDIC created Silicon Valley Bridge Bank, N.A., following the closure of Silicon Valley Bank by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation. All of the deposits and substantially all assets of Silicon Valley Bank were transferred to the bridge bank.

What will happen to SVB uninsured deposits? ›

Uninsured depositors will receive a receivership certificate for the remaining amount of their uninsured funds. As the FDIC sells the assets of Silicon Valley Bank, future dividend payments may be made to uninsured depositors.

How much of SVB deposits are insured? ›

The standard deposit insurance amount is up to $250,000 per depositor, per insured bank, for each account ownership category.

How much is the SVB bailout? ›

Third is that the FDIC was asked to pick up the $15.8 billion tab for protecting the uninsured depositors at Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank — a bill far larger than the relatively modest $2.4 billion cost of protecting insured depositors at those institutions.

What would Silicon Valley Bank have done differently? ›

Still, the bank could have easily boosted its LCR without fixing the problem on its balance sheet, as I noted in the blog. If they had identified the issue early enough, they could have simply transferred assets from long-term mortgage-backed securities to long-term Treasuries to raise the bank's LCR.

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Rueben Jacobs

Last Updated:

Views: 5458

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (77 voted)

Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Rueben Jacobs

Birthday: 1999-03-14

Address: 951 Caterina Walk, Schambergerside, CA 67667-0896

Phone: +6881806848632

Job: Internal Education Planner

Hobby: Candle making, Cabaret, Poi, Gambling, Rock climbing, Wood carving, Computer programming

Introduction: My name is Rueben Jacobs, I am a cooperative, beautiful, kind, comfortable, glamorous, open, magnificent person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.